Crestview Mutual · Claims DeskAdversarial
Adversarial
Adjudication
Four AI adjudicators debate every disputed denial through Band — one fights for the insured. The conversation is the legally-defensible audit trail.
The standing panel
Coordinator opens the case → Blake & Morgan weigh coverage → Alex challenges → Sam rules → a human signs off.
0
Disputes filed
0%
Denials overturned
0 of 0 resolved
$0
Value in dispute
0
In live review
Case docket
Loading…
How a verdict is reached
1
Intake
A disputed denial enters. The Coordinator opens the case file — policy, evidence, the original denial — and convenes the panel in a live Band room.
2
Adversarial debate
Blake checks coverage, Morgan quotes the policy verbatim, Alex fights for the insured, Sam rules. Every message is recorded — the conversation is the audit trail.
3
Human sign-off
A claims officer ratifies the verdict or overrides it. The record is sealed with a tamper-evident SHA-256 hash — defensible to any regulator.
Meet the panel
5 agents · 2 model providersBlake
Claims Evaluator
Analytical · Data-driven · Impartial
Morgan
Policy Analyst
Meticulous · Quote-first · Precise
Alex
Devil's Advocate
Combative · Insured-first · Relentless
Sam
Resolution Notary
Calm · Definitive · Final word
Coordinator
Claims Intake
Intake · Orchestration · Routing
Why adversarial?
A lone model rubber-stamps. A panel that must argue surfaces the exception a single pass would miss — and leaves a record of why.